Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation

Rene Plasser; Yasuhito Takahashi; Gergely Koczka; Oszkar Bíró

doi:10.1002/jnm.2279

Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation

Rene Plasser, Yasuhito Takahashi, Gergely Koczka, Oszkar Bíró

Institut für Grundlagen und Theorie der Elektrotechnik (4370)

Publikation: Beitrag in einer Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Begutachtung

Abstract

Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.

Originalsprache	englisch
Aufsatznummer	e2279
Seitenumfang	9
Fachzeitschrift	International Journal of Numerical Modelling
Jahrgang	31
Ausgabenummer	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/jnm.2279
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 2017

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1002/jnm.2279

Dieses zitieren

@article{1e9631a380f948b88fc518bf3159b67b,

title = "Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation",

abstract = "Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.",

keywords = "computational electromagnetics, eddy currents, finite element analysis, nonlinear magnetics",

author = "Rene Plasser and Yasuhito Takahashi and Gergely Koczka and Oszkar B{\'i}r{\'o}",

note = "jnm.2279",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1002/jnm.2279",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

journal = "International Journal of Numerical Modelling",

issn = "0894-3370",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation

AU - Plasser, Rene

AU - Takahashi, Yasuhito

AU - Koczka, Gergely

AU - Bíró, Oszkar

N1 - jnm.2279

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.

AB - Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.

KW - computational electromagnetics, eddy currents, finite element analysis, nonlinear magnetics

U2 - 10.1002/jnm.2279

DO - 10.1002/jnm.2279

M3 - Article

SN - 0894-3370

VL - 31

JO - International Journal of Numerical Modelling

JF - International Journal of Numerical Modelling

IS - 2

M1 - e2279

ER -

Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation

Abstract

Zugriff auf Dokument

Fingerprint

Dieses zitieren