TY - JOUR
T1 - Finding Critical Scenarios for Automated Driving Systems
T2 - A Systematic Mapping Study
AU - Zhang, Xinhai
AU - Tao, Jianbo
AU - Tan, Kaige
AU - Torngren, Martin
AU - Gaspar Sanchez, Jose Manuel
AU - Ramli, Muhammad Rusyadi
AU - Tao, Xin
AU - Gyllenhammar, Magnus
AU - Wotawa, Franz
AU - Mohan, Naveen
AU - Nica, Mihai
AU - Felbinger, Hermann
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
IEEE
PY - 2023/3/1
Y1 - 2023/3/1
N2 - Scenario-based approaches have been receiving a huge amount of attention in research and engineering of automated driving systems. Due to the complexity and uncertainty of the driving environment, and the complexity of the driving task itself, the number of possible driving scenarios that an Automated Driving System or Advanced Driving-Assistance System may encounter is virtually infinite. Therefore it is essential to be able to reason about the identification of scenarios and in particular critical ones that may impose unacceptable risk if not considered. Critical scenarios are particularly important to support design, verification and validation efforts, and as a basis for a safety case. In this paper, we present the results of a systematic mapping study in the context of autonomous driving. The main contributions are: (i) introducing a comprehensive taxonomy for critical scenario identification methods; (ii) giving an overview of the state-of-the-art research based on the taxonomy encompassing 86 papers between 2017 and 2020; and (iii) identifying open issues and directions for further research. The provided taxonomy comprises three main perspectives encompassing the problem definition (the why), the solution (the methods to derive scenarios), and the assessment of the established scenarios. In addition, we discuss open research issues considering the perspectives of coverage, practicability, and scenario space explosion.
AB - Scenario-based approaches have been receiving a huge amount of attention in research and engineering of automated driving systems. Due to the complexity and uncertainty of the driving environment, and the complexity of the driving task itself, the number of possible driving scenarios that an Automated Driving System or Advanced Driving-Assistance System may encounter is virtually infinite. Therefore it is essential to be able to reason about the identification of scenarios and in particular critical ones that may impose unacceptable risk if not considered. Critical scenarios are particularly important to support design, verification and validation efforts, and as a basis for a safety case. In this paper, we present the results of a systematic mapping study in the context of autonomous driving. The main contributions are: (i) introducing a comprehensive taxonomy for critical scenario identification methods; (ii) giving an overview of the state-of-the-art research based on the taxonomy encompassing 86 papers between 2017 and 2020; and (iii) identifying open issues and directions for further research. The provided taxonomy comprises three main perspectives encompassing the problem definition (the why), the solution (the methods to derive scenarios), and the assessment of the established scenarios. In addition, we discuss open research issues considering the perspectives of coverage, practicability, and scenario space explosion.
KW - Automated Driving
KW - Bibliographies
KW - Complexity theory
KW - Critical Scenario
KW - Roads
KW - Systematic Mapping Study
KW - Systematics
KW - Taxonomy
KW - Terminology
KW - Uncertainty
KW - systematic mapping study
KW - Critical scenario
KW - automated driving
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129616705&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TSE.2022.3170122
DO - 10.1109/TSE.2022.3170122
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85129616705
SN - 0098-5589
VL - 49
SP - 991
EP - 1026
JO - IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
JF - IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IS - 3
ER -