Description
Open Science promotes a new way of science. This involves the inclusion of non-academics in processes of knowledge production,transparent forms of peer review and quality assessment as well as free and open access to research outputs. With this agenda, OS opposes predominant elitist, closed, and inaccessible forms of science. There is a broad consensus in the OS literature why an alternative – more open – form of scientific practice is favorable. These reasons include higher epistemic quality of research outputs,greater justice and social welfare in the utilization of scientific knowledge and even equal opportunity to all who seek to contribute or benefit from scientific knowledge. Moreover, OS promoters frequently declare their commitment to the global sustainability goals and seek to meet the challenges of our times. It is argued that OS is potentially relevant for many different domains and may affect the relationships between academia, industry policy and civil society (cf. Carayannis et al. 2009; Schütz 2019). Our research aims to demonstrate how OS practices counter cumulative advantages in academia, enhance and stimulate innovation, provide accountable evidence for policy making and allows citizen engagement (ON-MERRIT 824612). Presenting first findings of our ongoing research, w ego beyond the review of the endorsed intentions of OS. With our analysis, we propose instead to look at the effects of OS practices.Here we focus on the uptake of scientific expertise in policy making processes and more specifically discuss available evidence regarding the role of OS in this context. In such a way, we aim to contribute to the broader discussion on how an “alternative science and technology” might look like.Period | 18 Jun 2021 |
---|---|
Event title | 8th STS Italia Conference: Dis/Entangling Technoscience: Vulnerability, Responsibility and Justice |
Event type | Conference |
Location | Trieste, ItalyShow on map |
Degree of Recognition | International |
Keywords
- open science
- RRI
Documents & Links
Related content
-
Activities
-
Matthew effects in Open Science?
Activity: Talk or presentation › Talk at conference or symposium › Science to science
-
Workshop on Climate Science & Policy-Making
Activity: Participation in or organisation of › Workshop, seminar or course (Participation in/Organisation of)
-
ON-MERRIT task 5.3 co-creation workshop
Activity: Participation in or organisation of › Workshop, seminar or course (Participation in/Organisation of)
-
Participatory processes of research and policy-making: examining uptake, access and representation, and the role(s) of OS/RRI
Activity: Talk or presentation › Poster presentation › Science to science
-
Workshop on Agricultural Sciences and Policy-Making
Activity: Participation in or organisation of › Workshop, seminar or course (Participation in/Organisation of)
-
Workshop on Health Sciences & Policy-Making
Activity: Participation in or organisation of › Workshop, seminar or course (Participation in/Organisation of)
-
Publications
-
ON-MERRIT D5.3 Networks of Engagement in Deliberative Policy-making: Expert Reflections on Barriers to Participation
Research output: Book/Report › Other report › peer-review
-
Dynamics of Cumulative Advantage and Threats to Equity in Open Science: A Scoping Review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
-
ON-MERRIT D5.1 Scoping Report: Open Science Outputs in Policy-Making and Public Participation
Research output: Working paper › peer-review
-
Projects