Discussion on “Semi-Implicit Euler Digital Implementation of Conditioned Super-Twisting Algorithm With Actuation Saturation”

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Theorem 1 in the discussed paper is shown to be incorrect by means of a simple counterexample. The example shows that the semi-implicit conditioned super-twisting algorithm does not admit a general tuning rule for its parameter κ1 that can guarantee the same control accuracy as in the absence of actuator saturation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4304
Number of pages1
JournalIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Volume71
Issue number4
Early online date15 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 May 2023

Keywords

  • counterexmple
  • input saturation
  • Economics
  • Three-dimensional displays
  • Simulation
  • Cognition
  • Trajectory
  • Doppler effect
  • Counterexample
  • Tuning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Control and Systems Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Discussion on “Semi-Implicit Euler Digital Implementation of Conditioned Super-Twisting Algorithm With Actuation Saturation”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this