Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Two Turbine Vane Frame Designs

Nicolas Krajnc, Asim Hafizovic, Lukas Wiesinger, Francesco Mangini, Patrick Zeno Sterzinger, Marios Patinios, Emil Göttlich

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study supported by numerical simulations of the performance of two turbine vane frames (TVFs) at various purge and TVF inlet swirl conditions representing both on- and off-design operation. The turbine vane frame (TVF) serves as a structural link connecting the last high-pressure turbine stage to the first low-pressure turbine stage, functioning as a vane row for the latter. The two configurations considered share a common fully purged high-pressure turbine stage, followed by distinct TVF and LPT rotor setups. Of the two TVFs considered, TVF1 features a single-splitter, while TVF2 incorporates a twin-splitter architecture. The experiments took place at Graz University of Technology's Transonic Test Turbine Facility (TTTF). The steady RANS simulations use 2D inlet boundary conditions derived from measurements and provide additional insights into critical flow phenomena. The dataset includes purge derivatives with three purge flow rates (PFR) of 0%, 50%, and 200%, the aero design point (ADP) with 100% PFR, and one swirl derivative with positive incidence for each case. Both configurations exhibit unique flow phenomena, leading to distinct ‘regions of sensitivity’ for each duct design. Due to the positive incidence and low aspect ratio strut design, TVF1 demonstrates a pronounced UPV that affects almost the entire span at the duct exit. Additionally, the UPV is found to be enhanced by the radial pressure gradient imposed by the duct’s second bend. In contrast, TVF2 experiences a region of low momentum flow at the hub, due to the combination of axial diffusion (as a result of area increase) and high flow turning. This low momentum flow region is manifested as a band of very low axial velocity, spread evenly around the circumference between the airfoil trailing edges and the LP-rotor. Purge variations exert differing impacts on the investigated geometries, with TVF2 showcasing greater robustness to purge derivatives.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTurbomachinery - Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9780791888070
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 Aug 2024
Event69th ASME Turbo Expo 2024: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2024 - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 24 Jun 202428 Jun 2024

Publication series

NameProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo
Volume12C

Conference

Conference69th ASME Turbo Expo 2024: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition, GT 2024
Abbreviated titleGT 2024
Country/TerritoryUnited Kingdom
CityLondon
Period24/06/2428/06/24

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Experimental and Numerical Comparison of Two Turbine Vane Frame Designs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this