Impact of temporal and spatial resolution on atrial feature tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Jonas Schmidt-Rimpler, Sören J. Backhaus, Finn P. Hartmann, Philip Schaten, Torben Lange, Ruben Evertz, Alexander Schulz, Johannes T. Kowallick, Tomas Lapinskas, Gerd Hasenfuß, Sebastian Kelle, Andreas Schuster*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Myocardial deformation assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking (CMR-FT) has incremental prognostic value over volumetric analyses. Recently, atrial functional analyses have come to the fore. However, to date recommendations for optimal resolution parameters for accurate atrial functional analyses are still lacking. Methods: CMR-FT was performed in 12 healthy volunteers and 9 ischemic heart failure (HF) patients. Cine sequences were acquired using different temporal (20, 30, 40 and 50 frames/cardiac cycle) and spatial resolution parameters (high 1.5 × 1.5 mm in plane and 5 mm slice thickness, standard 1.8 × 1.8 × 8 mm and low 3.0 × 3.0 × 10 mm). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility were calculated. Results: Increasing temporal resolution is associated with higher absolute strain and strain rate (SR) values. Significant changes in strain assessment for left atrial (LA) total strain occurred between 20 and 30 frames/cycle amounting to 2,5–4,4% in absolute changes depending on spatial resolution settings. From 30 frames/cycle onward, absolute strain values remained unchanged. Significant changes of LA strain rate assessment were observed up to the highest temporal resolution of 50 frames/cycle. Effects of spatial resolution on strain assessment were smaller. For LA total strain a general trend emerged for a mild decrease in strain values obtained comparing the lowest to the highest spatial resolution at temporal resolutions of 20, 40 and 50 frames/cycle (p = 0.006–0.046) but not at 30 frames/cycle (p = 0.140). Conclusion: Temporal and to a smaller extent spatial resolution affect atrial functional assessment. Consistent strain assessment requires a standard spatial resolution and a temporal resolution of 30 frames/cycle, whilst SR assessment requires even higher settings of at least 50 frames/cycle.

Original languageEnglish
Article number131563
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume396
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2024

Keywords

  • Cardiac magnetic resonance
  • Myocardial deformation
  • Reproducibility
  • Spatial resolution
  • Strain
  • Temporal resolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of temporal and spatial resolution on atrial feature tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this