Towards more general constitutive relations for metamaterials: A checklist for consistent formulations

Fatima Z. Goffi*, Karim Mnasri, Michael Plum, Carsten Rockstuhl, Andrii Khrabustovskyi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

When the period of unit cells constituting metamaterials is no longer much smaller than the wavelength but only smaller, local material laws fail to describe the propagation of light in such composite media when considered at the effective level. Instead, nonlocal material laws are required. They have to be derived by approximating a general response function of the electric field in the metamaterial at the effective level that is accurate but cannot be handled practically. But how to perform this approximation is not obvious at all. Indeed, many approximations can be perceived and one should be able to decide as quickly as possible which of these possible material laws are mathematically and physically meaningful at all. Here, at the example of a second order Padé approximation of the general response function of the electric field, we present a checklist of each possible constitutive relation that has to pass in order to be physically and mathematically liable. As will be shown, only two out of these nine Padé approximations pass the checklist. The work is meant to be a guideline applicable to decide which constitutive relation actually makes any sense at all. It is an essential ingredient for future research on composite media as any possible constitutive relation to be discussed should pass it.

Original languageEnglish
Article number195411
JournalPhysical Review B
Volume101
Issue number19
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards more general constitutive relations for metamaterials: A checklist for consistent formulations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this