TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Anisotropic Energy-Based and Jiles-Atherton Models of Ferromagnetic Hysteresis
AU - Upadhaya, B.
AU - Rasilo, P.
AU - Perkkio, L.
AU - Handgruber, P.
AU - Belahcen, A.
AU - Arkkio, A.
PY - 2020/4
Y1 - 2020/4
N2 - In this article, we apply an anisotropic extension for the energy-based and the Jiles-Atherton (JA) hysteresis models to simulate both unidirectional alternating and rotational magnetic field excitations. The results show a good agreement with measurements for unidirectional alternating fields. However, the results for rotational fields, especially at high magnitudes, show a significant discrepancy with the measurement data. We demonstrate that the JA model with appropriate parameters can estimate the losses in alternating cases up to 1.5 T, whereas both models give reasonable loss estimation up to 1 T in rotational cases.
AB - In this article, we apply an anisotropic extension for the energy-based and the Jiles-Atherton (JA) hysteresis models to simulate both unidirectional alternating and rotational magnetic field excitations. The results show a good agreement with measurements for unidirectional alternating fields. However, the results for rotational fields, especially at high magnitudes, show a significant discrepancy with the measurement data. We demonstrate that the JA model with appropriate parameters can estimate the losses in alternating cases up to 1.5 T, whereas both models give reasonable loss estimation up to 1 T in rotational cases.
KW - Energy-based (EB) model
KW - Jiles-Atherton (JA) model
KW - magnetic hysteresis
KW - non-oriented (NO) electrical steel
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082396741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMAG.2020.2964745
DO - 10.1109/TMAG.2020.2964745
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85082396741
SN - 0018-9464
VL - 56
JO - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
IS - 4
M1 - 8956032
ER -