Abstract
Long-term satellite-based observations have helped quantify glacier
mass change and the response of the hydrosphere to glacier changes.
However, subaqueous mass loss associated with lake-terminating glaciers
is not accounted for in geodetic methods, leading to an underestimation
of glacier mass loss. Here we use multi-temporal satellite data and an
empirical area–volume relationship to estimate the volume change of
glacial lakes across the greater Himalaya and quantify subaqueous mass
loss due to the replacement of ice with lake water. We show that proglacial
lakes have increased 47% by number, 33 ± 2% by area and 42 ± 14% by
volume from 2000 to 2020. The expansion of glacial lakes has resulted in
2.7 ± 0.8 Gt of subaqueous mass loss between 2000 and 2020, such that
the previous estimate of total mass loss of lake-terminating glaciers in the
greater Himalaya is underestimated by 6.5 ± 2.1%. Regionally, the largest
underestimation (10 ± 4%) occurred in the central Himalaya, where glacial
lake growth has been the most rapid. Our estimates reduce uncertainties
in total glacier mass loss, provide important data for glacio-hydrological
models and therefore also support the water recources management in this
sensitive mountain region.
mass change and the response of the hydrosphere to glacier changes.
However, subaqueous mass loss associated with lake-terminating glaciers
is not accounted for in geodetic methods, leading to an underestimation
of glacier mass loss. Here we use multi-temporal satellite data and an
empirical area–volume relationship to estimate the volume change of
glacial lakes across the greater Himalaya and quantify subaqueous mass
loss due to the replacement of ice with lake water. We show that proglacial
lakes have increased 47% by number, 33 ± 2% by area and 42 ± 14% by
volume from 2000 to 2020. The expansion of glacial lakes has resulted in
2.7 ± 0.8 Gt of subaqueous mass loss between 2000 and 2020, such that
the previous estimate of total mass loss of lake-terminating glaciers in the
greater Himalaya is underestimated by 6.5 ± 2.1%. Regionally, the largest
underestimation (10 ± 4%) occurred in the central Himalaya, where glacial
lake growth has been the most rapid. Our estimates reduce uncertainties
in total glacier mass loss, provide important data for glacio-hydrological
models and therefore also support the water recources management in this
sensitive mountain region.
Originalsprache | englisch |
---|---|
Seiten (von - bis) | 333-338 |
Seitenumfang | 6 |
Fachzeitschrift | Nature Geoscience |
Jahrgang | 16 |
Ausgabenummer | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publikationsstatus | Veröffentlicht - 3 Apr. 2023 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Allgemeine Erdkunde und Planetologie