TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction to
T2 - Lack of adverse effects in subchronic and chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity studies on the glyphosate-resistant genetically modified maize NK603 in Wistar Han RCC rats (Archives of Toxicology, (2019), 93, 4, (1095-1139), 10.1007/s00204-019-02400-1)
AU - Steinberg, Pablo
AU - van der Voet, Hilko
AU - Goedhart, Paul W.
AU - Kleter, Gijs
AU - Kok, Esther J.
AU - Pla, Maria
AU - Nadal, Anna
AU - Zeljenková, Dagmar
AU - Aláčová, Radka
AU - Babincová, Júlia
AU - Rollerová, Eva
AU - Jaďuďová, Soňa
AU - Kebis, Anton
AU - Szabova, Elena
AU - Tulinská, Jana
AU - Líšková, Aurélia
AU - Takácsová, Melinda
AU - Mikušová, Miroslava Lehotská
AU - Krivošíková, Zora
AU - Spök, Armin
AU - Racovita, Monica
AU - de Vriend, Huib
AU - Alison, Roger
AU - Alison, Clare
AU - Baumgärtner, Wolfgang
AU - Becker, Kathrin
AU - Lempp, Charlotte
AU - Schmicke, Marion
AU - Schrenk, Dieter
AU - Pöting, Annette
AU - Schiemann, Joachim
AU - Wilhelm, Ralf
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - (1) In the original publication, the starting point in time for the three feeding trials was incorrectly given. The first sentence in the second paragraph of the “Rat feeding trials” subchapter in the Materials and methods section (page 1098) should read: “The first 90-day feeding trial and the chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study were started 2–3 weeks and the second 90-day feeding trial was started 1–2 weeks after delivery of the animals at the animal testing facility”. (2) In the original publication, Figs. 5 and 6 (page 1118) showed, for all points in time, the mean body weight and the food consumption data, respectively, of only the male and female rats that survived until the end of the chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study. The figure legends refer, however, to another option, where all available data are used to calculate mean body weights and feed consumptions, and these legends describe the figures that we intended to publish. The current Figs. 5 and 6 should, therefore, be replaced by the accompanying new Figs. 5 and 6.
AB - (1) In the original publication, the starting point in time for the three feeding trials was incorrectly given. The first sentence in the second paragraph of the “Rat feeding trials” subchapter in the Materials and methods section (page 1098) should read: “The first 90-day feeding trial and the chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study were started 2–3 weeks and the second 90-day feeding trial was started 1–2 weeks after delivery of the animals at the animal testing facility”. (2) In the original publication, Figs. 5 and 6 (page 1118) showed, for all points in time, the mean body weight and the food consumption data, respectively, of only the male and female rats that survived until the end of the chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study. The figure legends refer, however, to another option, where all available data are used to calculate mean body weights and feed consumptions, and these legends describe the figures that we intended to publish. The current Figs. 5 and 6 should, therefore, be replaced by the accompanying new Figs. 5 and 6.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083795639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00204-020-02751-0
DO - 10.1007/s00204-020-02751-0
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 32328701
AN - SCOPUS:85083795639
SN - 0340-5761
VL - 94
SP - 1779
EP - 1781
JO - Archives of Toxicology
JF - Archives of Toxicology
IS - 5
ER -