Exploring Coverage and Distribution of Identifiers on the Scholarly Web

Peter Kraker, Asuraa Enkhbayar, Elisabeth Lex

Research output: Working paperPreprint

Abstract

In a scientific publishing environment that is increasingly moving online, identifiers of scholarly work are gaining in importance. In this paper, we analysed identifier distribution and coverage of articles from the discipline of quantitative biology using arXiv, Mendeley and CrossRef as data sources. The results show that when retrieving arXiv articles from Mendeley, we were able to find more papers using the DOI than the arXiv ID. This indicates that DOI may be a better identifier with respect to findability. We also find that coverage of articles on Mendeley decreases in the most recent years, whereas the coverage of DOIs does not decrease in the same order of magnitude. This hints at the fact that there is a certain time lag involved, before articles are covered in crowd-sourced services on the scholarly web.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 17 Mar 2015

Publication series

NamearXiv.org e-Print archive
PublisherCornell University Library

Keywords

  • identifiers
  • doi
  • url
  • publications
  • scholarly web

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Computer Science

Fields of Expertise

  • Information, Communication & Computing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Exploring Coverage and Distribution of Identifiers on the Scholarly Web'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this