Preregistration of an integrative review of conceptions and facilitators of and barriers to reproducibility of qualitative research

Nicki Lisa Cole*, Sven Ulpts, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Agata Bochynska, Thomas Klebel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

The proposed review is an integrative review. It has been designed in keeping with the guidance for integrative reviews developed by Whittemore and Knafl (2005) and elaborated by Torraco (2016) and Toronto and Remington (2020). An integrative review is ideal for these purposes because reproducibility and replicability of qualitative research is an emerging topic with a growing body of literature surrounding it that is not uniform in stance nor conclusions. As Torraco observes, conducting an integrative review can lead to “an initial or preliminary conceptualization of the topic rather than a reconceptualization of existing models.”
Original languageEnglish
PublisherOpen Science Framework
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • reproducibility
  • replicability
  • qualitative research
  • open science
  • Qualitative methods
  • scoping review
  • Systematic review
  • integrative review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preregistration of an integrative review of conceptions and facilitators of and barriers to reproducibility of qualitative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this