Discussion on “Semi-Implicit Euler Digital Implementation of Conditioned Super-Twisting Algorithm With Actuation Saturation”

Richard Seeber

doi:10.1109/TIE.2023.3274855

Discussion on “Semi-Implicit Euler Digital Implementation of Conditioned Super-Twisting Algorithm With Actuation Saturation”

Richard Seeber

Institut für Regelungs- und Automatisierungstechnik (4430)

Publikation: Beitrag in einer Fachzeitschrift › Artikel › Begutachtung

Abstract

Theorem 1 in the discussed paper is shown to be incorrect by means of a simple counterexample. The example shows that the semi-implicit conditioned super-twisting algorithm does not admit a general tuning rule for its parameter κ₁ that can guarantee the same control accuracy as in the absence of actuator saturation.

Originalsprache	englisch
Seiten (von - bis)	4304
Seitenumfang	1
Fachzeitschrift	IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Jahrgang	71
Ausgabenummer	4
Frühes Online-Datum	15 Mai 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2023.3274855
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 1 Apr. 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Elektrotechnik und Elektronik
Steuerungs- und Systemtechnik

Zugriff auf Dokument

10.1109/TIE.2023.3274855Lizenz: CC BY 4.0

Discussion_on_Semi-Implicit_Euler_Digital_Implementation_of_Conditioned_Super-Twisting_Algorithm_With_Actuation_SaturationEndgültige, publizierte Fassung, 243 KBLizenz: CC BY 4.0

Andere Dateien und Links

Verknüpfung zur Publikation in Scopus

Dieses zitieren

@article{42d34298ce7f444da239905bca06e605,

title = "Discussion on “Semi-Implicit Euler Digital Implementation of Conditioned Super-Twisting Algorithm With Actuation Saturation”",

abstract = "Theorem 1 in the discussed paper is shown to be incorrect by means of a simple counterexample. The example shows that the semi-implicit conditioned super-twisting algorithm does not admit a general tuning rule for its parameter κ1 that can guarantee the same control accuracy as in the absence of actuator saturation.",

keywords = "counterexmple, input saturation, Economics, Three-dimensional displays, Simulation, Cognition, Trajectory, Doppler effect, Counterexample, Tuning",

author = "Richard Seeber",

year = "2024",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1109/TIE.2023.3274855",

language = "English",

volume = "71",

pages = "4304",

journal = "IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics",

issn = "0278-0046",

publisher = "Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discussion on “Semi-Implicit Euler Digital Implementation of Conditioned Super-Twisting Algorithm With Actuation Saturation”

AU - Seeber, Richard

PY - 2024/4/1

Y1 - 2024/4/1

N2 - Theorem 1 in the discussed paper is shown to be incorrect by means of a simple counterexample. The example shows that the semi-implicit conditioned super-twisting algorithm does not admit a general tuning rule for its parameter κ1 that can guarantee the same control accuracy as in the absence of actuator saturation.

AB - Theorem 1 in the discussed paper is shown to be incorrect by means of a simple counterexample. The example shows that the semi-implicit conditioned super-twisting algorithm does not admit a general tuning rule for its parameter κ1 that can guarantee the same control accuracy as in the absence of actuator saturation.

KW - counterexmple

KW - input saturation

KW - Economics

KW - Three-dimensional displays

KW - Simulation

KW - Cognition

KW - Trajectory

KW - Doppler effect

KW - Counterexample

KW - Tuning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162862113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/TIE.2023.3274855

DO - 10.1109/TIE.2023.3274855

M3 - Article

SN - 0278-0046

VL - 71

SP - 4304

JO - IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

JF - IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

IS - 4

ER -

Discussion on “Semi-Implicit Euler Digital Implementation of Conditioned Super-Twisting Algorithm With Actuation Saturation”

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Zugriff auf Dokument

Andere Dateien und Links

Fingerprint

Dieses zitieren